The Scientific Buddha: His Short and Happy Life (The Terry Lectures Series)

This publication tells the tale of the clinical Buddha, "born" in Europe within the 1800s yet more often than not stressed with the Buddha born in India 2,500 years in the past. The medical Buddha was once despatched into conflict opposed to Christian missionaries, who have been proclaiming throughout Asia that Buddhism was once a kind of superstition. He proved the missionaries improper, instructing a dharma that was once in concord with glossy technology. And his impression maintains. this present day his instructing of "mindfulness" is heralded as the medication for all demeanour of maladies, from melancholy to excessive blood pressure.

In this powerful critique, a well-known chronicler of the West's come upon with Buddhism demonstrates how the clinical Buddha's teachings deviate in the most important methods from these of the some distance older Buddha of historical India. Donald Lopez indicates that the Western specialize in the medical Buddha threatens to bleach Buddhism of its vibrancy, complexity, and tool, whilst the superficial specialise in "mindfulness" turns Buddhism into simply the most recent self-help circulate. The clinical Buddha has served his function, Lopez argues. it truly is now time for him to move into nirvana. this isn't to claim, besides the fact that, that the lessons of the traditional Buddha has to be brushed off as mere cultural artifacts. They proceed to provide a potent problem, even to our smooth world.

Show description

Quick preview of The Scientific Buddha: His Short and Happy Life (The Terry Lectures Series) PDF

Show sample text content

For Christianity, technology has frequently been represented as a problem to scripture, in particular to the publication of Genesis in the beginning and the bills of the resurrection on the finish. That problem has been strong, and protracted, and the relation among Christianity and technological know-how, no less than in its so much obvious and up to date types, has been characterised as a relation of antagonism. Why has it been varied for Buddhism? it is very important observe that there were moments of antagonism, even though they're lengthy forgotten.

Just like the Buddha’s unique teachings, the neurology of the Buddha’s enlightenment is irretrievable. And so the query of the beginning of doctrine is still within the area of fantasy. yet Buddhist clergymen and nuns have contemplated for millennia, they usually have performed so in response to discursive directions, a discourse that has lengthy claimed to bring about the private states of expertise of which the human brain is able. If there's to be a discussion among Buddhism and technological know-how, it is going to are available the shape of translation, an task vital to the unfold of the dharma over the centuries and around the nation-states.

1 “Sagamoni Borcan” is Mongolian for Śākyamuni Buddha, probably the most universal names for the old Buddha; Śākyamuni capacity “sage of the Śākya extended family” in Sanskrit. The extra very important part of Marco Polo’s account, even though, is that he describes the Buddha as an idol and Buddhists as idolaters, labels that might stay in position for the subsequent years. As famous past, till lengthy into the 19th century, eu writers divided the area into 4 countries (in the feel of peoples): Christians, Jews, Mahometans, and Idolaters.

And in a few feel, what we predict of this present day because the educational examine of faith has during the last centuries been dedicated to the method of keeping apart out a number of teams of those idolaters and giving them their very own religions, each one finishing in -ism: Hinduism, Sikhism, Daoism, Confucianism, Shintoism, Buddhism. Marco Polo, just like the tourists who preceded and him, by no means pointed out the faith he encountered with the identify “Buddhism” (or a few tough chinese language or Mongol an identical) or its clergymen as “Buddhists.

2 this can be evidently now not a flattering portrait. Father Kircher starts off through asserting that the Buddha believed in Pythagoreanism. For the church, this didn't suggest that he used to be a scholar of geometry yet that he believed within the transmigration of souls, or metempsychosis, a view that considering the fact that antiquity have been attributed to Pythagoras, who's stated to have heard the voice of a lifeless buddy within the yelps of a dog. For the church, the doctrine of reincarnation used to be a heresy. Father Kircher acknowledges that the Buddha (a time period he doesn't use) is understood via a couple of names, mistakenly including that of the Hindu god Rama; in keeping with later Hindu mythology, the Buddha used to be the 9th avatar or incarnation of the god Vishnu, with Rama being the 7th and Krishna the 8th.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.92 of 5 – based on 32 votes